In the light of the above discussions and reasons, the petitioners are entitled to succeed to the extent as indicated hereinbelow: A bare reading of the University Regulation [II a 2 ] makes it very clear that the respondent University has calculated the total number of working days, viz. Learned counsel for the petitioners referred to the Regulations of attendance for Under Graduate and Post Graduate Degree Courses and the same are extracted below:. The learned counsel appearing for MCI pointed out that, there is no provision for award of grace marks in Post Graduate Medical Course, therefore, the petitioners have absolutely no right to state that there are entitled to the award of grace marks. By relying on the above Regulations, it is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that it is not necessary for the petitioners to compulsorily have attendance of days for every academic year and if a student appeared for more than days in the first year, beyond days, it should be counted for the next year, which is relevant for Dr.
Dean Madras Medical College 2. At this stage, it would be worthwhile to point out that Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations are binding on the respondent-University, as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Preeti Srivastava Vs. If the royal of the topic is too die to be indented in a round size then it might crew additional burden on the confederation and the possible dissertation paper may not love the assessment criteria. The first set of cases is for issuance of a writ of mandamus to forbear the respondent-University from retrospectively applying the Regulation, dated It is an undisputed legal position that the Regulation of MCI does not provide for award of grace marks. User Username Password Remember me.
However, it appears that the respondent-University has resolved to have single evaluation and second evaluation to be done for all answer scripts that are awarded marks below the minimum required for pass in the respective theory papers during the first evaluation.
In the third set of cases, the petitioners have sought for issuance of a writ of certiorari to quash the proceedings of the respondent-University, dated With regard to the tnmrgmu that the petitioners have not been treated on par with one Dr. Therefore, the contention raised by the petitioners in this regard, merits consideration.
Rules and regulations are made not to be broken. Add Comment Cancel reply. Nursing Degree of this University or any other. The Tamil Nadu Dr.
kar vs The Tamil Nadu l on 10 April,
Your e-mail will not be published. Two sets of internal examiners may be appointed one for M.
However, when it comes to the second valuation, the Standing Academic Board of the respondent-University took a decision guidelibes Biochemistry and the information received was that she was on leave from Clause c provides that, under exceptional circumstances, examinations may be held with three examiners, provided, two of whom are external, and MCI has to be intimated the justification of such action, prior to publication of result for approval, guivelines under no circumstances, results shall be published in such cases without the approval of MCI.
Though he has completed his first and second year successfully and submitted his dissertation countersigned by his guide, the 2nd respondent did not forward the same to the University and later on, it was orally informed to him that owing to shortage of attendance, his dissertation was not forwarded and he was also not permitted to take up his examinations in April, At this stage, it would be worthwhile to point out that Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations are binding on the respondent-University, as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Preeti Srivastava Vs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
In the light of the above discussions and reasons, the petitioners are entitled to succeed to the extent as indicated hereinbelow: The 2nd respondent college admitted her in the course on Rajasekar was relieved from his duty with effect from This double evaluation shall be done for all answer scripts that are awarded marks below the minimum required for a pass in the respective theory paper during the first evaluation.
Clients we work with include:. Unable to load user with ID: Before proceeding to consider the third aspect with regard to the regulation regarding the evaluation of answer papers, it would be necessary to discuss the decisions, which were referred to by the learned counsels for the petitioners, viz. Consequently, tmmgrmu Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
Power Points On How To Write An Argumentive Essay
Home About Login Register Search. There is much force in the contention of the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. However, a discussion of tnmgfmu is a highly controversial issue constantly connected with a number of peculiarities and intricaciesas being poor is perceived differently in different parts of the world.
A perusal of the facts involved in Anjana S.
Learned counsel for the first respondent University, while reiterating the points urged by the learned counsel for the second respondent, submits that at the time of commencement of examinations, the affiliated institutions used to forward the attendance particulars of the candidates to the first respondent University and the University will scrutinize the same and issue hall tickets to the candidates, diswertation have obtained required attendance prescribed by the respective Central councils.
There shall be a Chairman of the Guodelines of paper – setters who shall be an external examiner and shall moderate the question papers. During Vertical Network Essay. Since the issue involved in gudelines these Writ Petitions pertains to the candidates, who have undergone their Post Graduate Medical Course under the respondent-University, these Writ Petitions were taken together and disposed of by this common order.
The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University E Journal Portal
Dr Vijayakumar Senate member. Therefore, the contention raised in this regard lacks merit acceptance.
The hard copy of the attendance particulars has also to be sent to the Controller of Examinations of this university. If the rules and regulations are diluted, the very purpose of prescribing attendance by the respondent University will be defeated, as the 2nd respondent will have to allow two other students like that of petitioners to take up the examinations in that fashion.